Friday, February 4, 2011

Toxic Chemicals in Pregnant Women? A Q&A with Sarah Janssen


(Here is a guest post from the NRDC's blog, Simple Steps.  It is By Catherine Zandonella, M.P.H. and features an interview with NRDC health scientist (and mom) Dr. Sarah Janssen about how chemicals may impact nursing infants and children later in life, as well as some easy ways moms can reduce chemical exposure, in the womb and in the home.)

This January, a study by the University of California San Francisco confirmed that pregnant women carry multiple chemicals in their bodies that can be passed onto their fetus. Published in Environmental Health Perspectives, the study evaluated data collected by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 2003-2004. Overall, 43 banned as well as currently used chemicals -- including PCBs, organochlorine pesticides, PFCs, phenols, PBDE flame retardants, phthalates -- were detected in 99-100% of over 250 pregnant women.

Though we have known for many years that humans are contaminated with dozens of chemicals from birth until late in life, this study marks the first time the number of chemicals in pregnant women has been counted. Many of the 163 chemicals studied are known to be transferred to the fetus and have been linked to poor health outcomes, placing them at risk for birth defects or chronic illnesses later in life. Some of the chemicals detected -- such as PCBs -- have been banned for over 30 years.
This study adds to the weight of evidence that unborn babies are exposed to a soup of chemicals during vulnerable periods of development. Furthermore, because the women in the study were tested for exposure to only a fraction of chemicals on the market, it also suggests that pregnant women are likely carrying and passing onto their fetuses many more chemicals than have been reported here. Catherine Zandonella spoke with NRDC senior scientist Sarah Janssen about the implications for women and their children.

Q: What are the possible harmful health effects to a child who was exposed in the womb to these chemicals during pregnancy?

SJ: Over the past several decades, scientists have discovered that exposures occurring early in life, either in the womb or during early stages of childhood development, can cause harm that doesn’t occur when the exposure happens later in life. This is because during fetal, neonatal and early childhood the body is rapidly growing and developing under a carefully orchestrated process that is dependent on stepwise events.

When one of those events is interrupted, the next event is disrupted and so on until permanent and irreversible changes can result. This could result in a very subtle effect -- like an alteration in how the brain develops resulting in changes in attention span, learning ability, or behavioral changes. Or it could result in other impacts like altering where fat cells are deposited in the body or modifying the development of an organ predisposing it to cancer later in life.

Many of these types of studies have been done in laboratory animals, but we do have some evidence gestational exposures are causing human harm. For example, lead, mercury and PCBs have all been shown to harm the developing brain resulting in a loss of IQ points, impaired learning and memory, and behavioral changes.

Q: Can nursing infants be exposed to these chemicals, if so, and what harm might result from breastfeeding?

SJ: Yes, some of these chemicals are found in breast milk. It is frustrating and maddening that a baby’s first food is contaminated with industrial chemicals, but breast milk remains the best form of nutrition for infants.

The benefits of breast feeding outweigh any of the risks -- including exposure to chemicals. We have information about the benefits to mom and baby on our website.

In addition, there have been some studies that have shown breast feeding can counter some of the harmful effects often seen after exposure to PCBs in the womb. Bottom line is that while we work to eliminate the most harmful chemicals from our breast milk -- breast remains best!

Q: Can fetal exposure to chemicals in the womb cause problems with fertility and reproduction later in life?

SJ: Yes, it is likely. Because gametes -- the cells that form sperm and eggs -- are formed in fetal life and reproductive organs are also forming throughout gestation, exposures to chemicals during this time can permanently alter these structures and result in infertility that isn’t manifest until several decades later.
For example, from animal studies we know that exposure to phthalates during fetal development can result in malformed genitals, poor sperm quality and even testicular cancer. Preliminary studies in humans have linked phthalate exposure during fetal development to a feminization of the genitals, though it isn’t yet known whether this results in reproductive harm.


PS-  that's my pregnant belly

image:  Kurt Budliger Photography

Thursday, February 3, 2011

New Posts (Non-Toxic Yoga Mats and Picture Books that Teach History)


Are you inhaling harmful chemicals with every nasmaste or child's pose?  If you are using a regular yoga mat, it is likely that you are.  I wrote a post over at MightyNest about why we all should be using safer, non-toxic yoga mats to relax, strengthen, and rejuvenate.

Did you love history growing up?  Just yesterday I wrote this post about 3 picture books that teach history to young readers.  These books make history come alive by telling stories and connecting readers to the past.  We are so lucky to have books like this that can make these topics meaningful to children.  

How are you all doing this week?  What have you been reading and thinking about, other than snow?  :)

image:  by ☼zlady on Flickr under CC

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

Momsrising Action: Tell the IRS Breast Pumps are a Medical Expense!

(This important action just came into my inbox from Momsrising.  Moms need all the help and support they can get while caring for and breastfeeding a baby.)
Did you see the below about breast pumps and the IRS yet?  Folks are outraged! "The message from the IRS is: It's only women involved, so it doesn't matter," wrote MomsRising member Carol Valentine of Staatsburg, NY.

Read below and sign on our message to the IRShttp://action.momsrising.org/go/596?akid=2486.198352.iFW4va&t=2 

Over 13,000 people have already signed on to our petition to the IRS.  Help us get to our goal of 20,000.  Sign on now and forward this email to friends too so they also can help stop this outrage.

We've seen time and time again that our voices have an incredible impact when we come together.  Just recently, MomsRising members joined others in supporting Senator Mark Udall's proposal that Congress should break with tradition and have mixed party seating during the State of the Union as a small gesture to help foster a new sense of cooperation and unity to better address the serious issues facing our nation's families.  Last night, for the first time in nearly 100 year, Congress did this!  [6,7]
Working together we're a force for our nation's families. 
Help us get to our goal of 20,000 signatures to the IRS by signing our message to them here:  http://action.momsrising.org/go/596?akid=2486.198352.iFW4va&t=4
-- Ashley
------Begin Forwarded Message------
Subject: Really, IRS?
Dear Katy ,
A mountain of medical evidence shows that breast milk provides significant health benefits to both mother and child.  
Tell the IRS they should follow medical opinion, not overturn it!
When my son was a baby, my breast pump was such a fixture in our house that my husband and I started to think it was talking to us. As the engine hummed, he swore the pump said, "More milk!" and I conveniently heard it whisper, "Cookies, cookies!"  Despite my love/hate relationship with that pump, I was grateful that it gave me the opportunity to follow my pediatrician's advice and continue to feed my son breast milk while I was at work.
So imagine my (and millions of other mothers') dismay upon learning that the Internal Revenue Service – yes, the tax folks! – had determined that “breast-feeding does not have enough health benefits to qualify as a form of medical care” and, as a result, will not allow breast pumps and supplies to be purchased using funds in pre-tax medical savings accounts.[1] 
This decision completely defies logic!  Particularly since every major medical authority, including the American Academy of Pediatrics, recommends breastfeeding exclusively for the first six months and support for breastfeeding for the first year and beyond.[2]  These recommendations are based on the overwhelming evidence that it provides health benefits to both mother and child. And the Food and Drug Administration already considers breast pumps medical devices and regulates them as such.[3]
Time to re-think this one, IRS!  Add your name to our petition calling on the IRS to reverse their decision on breast pumps now:http://action.momsrising.org/go/596?akid=2486.198352.iFW4va&t=8
Your signatures on our petition will let the IRS know that the public rejects their conclusion that breast milk is not a significant health benefit.  And our grassroots muscle will provide critical back-up to the efforts of Senator Jeff Merkley (OR), Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney (NY), and 41 other Members of Congress as they appeal to the IRS to reverse this decision.[4]
The medical evidence that breastfeeding is good for children’s health is overwhelming and pretty easy to find.  Researchers have found that breastfeeding is beneficial for both mother and child.  Children who are breastfed have decreased risk of infections, diarrhea, sudden infant death syndrome, obesity, type 1 and 2 diabetes, asthma, and childhood leukemia. Women who breastfeed have a reduced risk of breast cancer, ovarian cancer, type 2 diabetes, and postpartum depression.[5]
Sign our petition reminding the IRS to leave medicine to the experts! http://action.momsrising.org/go/596?akid=2486.198352.iFW4va&t=11
Together, we are a powerful voice for women, children, and families. 
-- Ashley and the whole MomsRising Team
P.S. Check out MomsRising’s “Breastfeeding & Work” resource page: http://action.momsrising.org/go/531?akid=2486.198352.iFW4va&t=13  This page includes information about new protections for nursing moms at work, resources to share with your employer, and more.
P.P.S. For more analysis (and venting!) about this IRS ruling, check out Michelle Brandt’s fabulous blog, “Really, IRS?”: http://action.momsrising.org/go/532?akid=2486.198352.iFW4va&t=15
CITATIONS
[2] American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), Breastfeeding Recommendations
[3] Food and Drug Administration, Breast Pump Information Page
[4] Senate Letter to IRS Commissioner, November 23, 2010; House Letter to IRS Commissioner, November 23, 2010.
[5] Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Breastfeeding: Maternal & Infant Health Outcomes
Like what we're doing? Donate: We're a bootstrap, low overhead, mom run organization. Your donations make the work of MomsRising.org possible--and we deeply appreciate your support. Every little bit counts.
image:  by Wayan Vota on Flickr under Creative Commons